Boyd v. Colvin, No. 15-2980 (8th Cir. 2016)
Annotate this CasePlaintiff appealed the denial of supplemental security income (SSI) and disability insurance benefits (DIB). Plaintiff alleged disability due to diabetes mellitus, heart problems, fatigue, and chest, back and leg pain. The court concluded that substantial evidence supports the ALJ's finding that plaintiff has the residual functioning capacity to perform sedentary work; the ALJ properly discounted the opinion of plaintiff's physician, Dr. Johnson, based upon lack of support in the examination record; the ALJ adequately explained that he discounted plaintiff's description of limited daily activities because it could not be adequately verified, was inconsistent with the “relatively weak medical evidence,” and was not supported by corresponding specific restrictions on activities imposed by a treating physician; and the ALJ did not err in accepting the testimony of the vocational expert where the testimony constituted substantial evidence to support the ALJ's finding at step five of the sequential evaluation process. Accordingly, the court affirmed the judgment.
Court Description: Shepherd, Author, with Wollman and Arnold, Circuit Judges] Civil Case - social security. The decision to deny disability insurance and supplemental security income benefits is supported by substantial evidence. The ALJ properly determined Boyd's residual functional capacity to perform sedentary work; the absence of clinical findings supported rejection of his physician's opinion; the ALJ adequately explained that he discounted Boyd's description of limitations of daily activities; and the vocational expert's testimony of available jobs in the national economy provided substantial evidence.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.